A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving prospective neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times posting about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development will work at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children household. The situation is now emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore regions are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a delicate coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly constructed, is in the right placement. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, an image that has due to the fact turn out to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the drinking water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site up included in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is actually a disagreement around boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply seeking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Specific Area of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether the wall as built complies with preparing authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Particular Spot of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living together with each other long once the authorized expenses happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it will eventually be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.